Douglas Murray Never Noticed

I was watching Douglas Murray complaining about Covid lockdowns and masks and social distancing and all the rest of it, and how immensely socially destructive it all was, and how unnecessary it was.

As I listened, I was thinking: This has all happened before, and it has all happened very recently – with smoking bans. And they were equally unnecessary, and equally socially destructive. When was Douglas Murray going to mention smoking bans?

But he never did mention them.

I strongly suspect that Douglas Murray is a non-smoker who simply never noticed smoking bans, because they didn’t personally affect him. Or maybe he’s an antismoker (although I’ve never heard any antismoking sentiment expressed by him).

But I think that if we now have draconian lockdowns and social distancing and masks, it’s because the powers that be took notice of the lack of reaction (by “thought leaders” like Douglas Murray) to smoking bans, and took this as a green light for any number of new restrictions, which we’re now seeing with lockdowns and masks.

The likes of Douglas Murray are getting what they deserve. They wouldn’t speak up for smokers, and now a smoker like me won’t speak up for them.

“First they came for the smokers and I did not speak out —
  Because I was not a smoker.” (not quite Martin Niemoller)

I don’t think Douglas Adams Murray is a thought leader. I think he’s a thought follower.

Do we have any thought leaders?

Not really.

Oh, and he never got to say anything much about music either.

Posted in Uncategorized | 16 Comments

Laurence Fox Reclaim Party

Not sure what to make of this.

Laurence Fox has started a new political party. It’s called the Reclaim Party.

He got into the news a while back for his appearance on Question Time. I didn’t see it because I don’t have a TV licence.

I’m not sure what the fuss was all about. But now it’s emerged that he’s starting a new political party.

I remembered mentioning him a few months back, sitting drinking a beer and smoking a cigarette outside a pub.

I wonder if his new party will repeal the UK smoking ban? None of the other parties will.

If they do, I’ll vote for them. It’s the only thing that really matters to me.

But the new party doesn’t have a manifesto. So I don’t know what to make of it.

I guess we’ll find out soon enough.

Posted in Uncategorized | 5 Comments

Flu d’état

Climate Depot:

‘A flu d’état?’ – ‘Will the Covid-19 PsyOp succeed?’ – ‘A takeover of our supposedly democratic political process by unelected & unaccountable administrative state medical bureaucrats’

It’s already happened. It happened a long time ago. Ask the world’s smokers. They’ve long been under the thumb of the unelected and unaccountable administrative state medical bureaucrats in Tobacco Control.

All that’s happening now is that everyone else is being subjected to the same thing in a different guise: the coronavirus pandemic.

Public Health trumps everything else. Public Health trumps democracy, freedom, justice, truth, reason,. It’s now the only thing that matters.

BBC:

Pictures of large crowds gathering in Liverpool two hours before new Covid-19 restrictions came into effect “shame our city”, its mayor has said.

The new rules mean pubs in the city region not serving meals must stay shut. along with gyms, leisure centres, betting shops and casinos.

Why does it matter if pubs serve meals or not? Does the virus stop spreading if you eat sausage and chips? Of course it doesn’t.

It’s just an excuse to shut down places disapproved by the killjoy controllers. Like leisure centres, betting shops, and casinos.

All sorts of old agendas are jumping on the bandwagon.

The World Economic Forum COVID Action Platform:

We must move on from neoliberalism in the post-COVID era

The pandemic has triggered a public health and economic crisis on a scale unseen in generations and has exacerbated systemic problems such as inequality and great-power posturing.

The only acceptable response to such a crisis is to pursue a “Great Reset” of our economies, politics, and societies. Indeed, this is a moment to re-evaluate the sacred cows of the pre-pandemic system, but also to defend certain long-held values. The task we face is to preserve the accomplishments of the past 75 years in a more sustainable form.

It’s not just about health: it’s about inequality too. There must be an economic, political, and social revolution. And it must be “sustainable”. And “acceptable” as well.

They’re never going to let Covid-19 die out. It’s far too valuable to them 

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , | 16 Comments

Disenchantment

I experienced the smoking ban of 1 July 2007 as a profound loss of freedom. Britain no longer seemed like a free country after that.

But was it ever a free country?

What is a free country?

Maybe it was a free country back in 1914. If so, it waa about to stop being one, and never has been free since then.

In 1914, at the outbreak of WW1, hundreds of thousands of Britons volunteered to join the armed forces. The important point to note is that they volunteered. But it seems that, as the war dragged on, this initial enthusiasm to volunteer abated. It’s not hard to see why. More and more men were being killed in the trenches of Flanders, or were coming back maimed. And there seemed to be no end in sight for a war that was supposed to be “over by Christmas.”

Faced with a shortfall of volunteers, in January 1916 the British government introduced conscription. Anyone between the ages of 18 and 40 could be called up for military service. This law remained in force until 1920.

In WW2, some 20 years later, conscription was introduced from the outset. It wasn’t lifted until 1960.

My question is this: to what extent can anyone say that they are a free man if they can be conscripted at any moment into an army, regardless of their own wishes? A free man is someone who chooses what he will and will not do. Once he can no longer do that, he is no longer free: he’s a slave.

It’s true that there isn’t conscription in Britain right now, and there hasn’t been for the past 60 years. But that doesn’t matter, because if the British government decides it wants to re-introduce prescription, it can do it tomorrow. And it will do it tomorrow.

So the way I see it, us Britons are all slaves.

It’s no better in the USA, “the land of the free”: they’ve had multiple drafts.

And we probably have been slaves for a lot longer than since January 1916.

The only difference between me and most other Britons is that they always knew they were slaves, and I didn’t: I thought I was free. Stupid me. It was why I revolted against the smoking ban, and they didn’t.

I’ve voted all my life, because I thought my vote mattered. But now I think that my vote doesn’t matter a damn, The British government is always re-elected at every election, with one or two minor cosmetic changes. Nothing ever changes.

I’ve become disenchanted.

Does it matter? In my case, not really. But I suspect that when governments lose the trust of their own people, there are likely to be consequences.

Conscription is more important than any smoking ban, but they both boil down to the same thing: in both cases somebody else decides for you what you will do.

We no longer live in free societies. A mantle of control is slowly descending on all of us. First in large matters like conscription, and then in smaller matters like smoking. Soon we will be controlled in everything we do. It won’t just be smoking that’s banned in pubs, but alcohol will be banned too, and then most likely food as well, and then talk. And we’ll all have to wear masks all the time, to conceal the expressions on our faces  (which is what masks are for).

I’m living in an age of dying freedoms. Freedom is slipping away. There was more freedom in Britain 200 years ago than there is now. And there’ll be even less in another 200 years.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged | 18 Comments

Q Fun

I’ve been following Qanon on and off over the past year or so.

 

It’s a nice idea. As I understand it, it goes like this: there is someone from military intelligence codenamed Q who is very close to Donald Trump (perhaps even in the same room), and who leaves enigmatic messages online, and thereby provides Trump with an information outlet separate from the mainstream media. Doing something like this makes some sense, given that the MSM are utterly opposed to Trump, and misreport him all the time. Sample enigmatic recent Q post:

Q !!Hs1Jq13jV6 ID: f475cc No.10872166
Oct 1 2020 13:42:30 (EST)
https://twitter.com/RubinReport/status/1311469297613504512
[D] party con.
[D] party playbook.
Who are the real racists?
THE WORLD IS WAKING UP.
Q

What does it mean? I have no idea. Was it a prediction that Trump was about to get Covid himself? Was that the “C19 event”? Or was the “C19 event” just the current pandemic? Who knows?

But there’s a whole army of Anons who decode these messages, and use them to try to predict upcoming events. e.g Praying Medic and JustInformedTalk

The MSM seems to have just gone crazy about Q:

Following Falsehoods: A Reporter’s Approach on QAnon
Kevin Roose, a Times tech columnist, has watched the baseless conspiracy theory grow from fringe internet subculture to mass movement, carefully calibrating …

As QAnon grew, Facebook and Twitter missed years of warning signs about the conspiracy theory’s violent nature
QAnon posts began threatening violence in 2018. But it would be 2020 before Facebook and Twitter would make major moves to curb QAnon’s presence on …

What is QAnon and why is it so dangerous?
The Guardian US technology reporter Julia Carrie Wong explains the rise of QAnon, the unfounded conspiracy theory that emerged in the US in 2017, and is …

‘Quite frankly terrifying’: How the QAnon conspiracy theory is taking root in the UK
It began in the US with lurid claims and a hatred of the ‘deep state’. Now it’s growing in the UK, spilling over into anti-vaccine and 5G protests, fuelled by online ..

As far as I’ve ever seen, there’s nothing “violent” or “dangerous” about Q. Anyone who thinks there is has been reading that into it. No surprise if the MSM don’t like Q: they’re in competition.

I just think it’s all a bit of online conspiratorial fun. It adds a new dimension to events. But I don’t take it at all seriously.

And Q hasn’t posted anything since 1 October. If he’s always near Trump, perhaps he’s in Walter Reed hospital, recovering from his own bout of Covid?

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged | 15 Comments

Who’s Next?

WordPress seems to have got rid of its classic editor, and I have no idea how to use its new one, so this post will likely be a complete mess. I can’t seem to indent anything. Or add any tags.

ZeroHedge:

In the latest hint that Trump’s condition may be more serious than his doctor and his team have let on, NBC News is reporting that the president has developed “shortness of breath” on top of the other symptoms listed earlier by his doctor – including a low grade fever. 

Shortness of breath was what I had. Some days I was panting for breath for hours. It’s one of the Covid-19 symptoms. I had several other symptoms as well: e.g. diarrhoea. And I also now have a heart condition associated with Covid.

But that was back in January. What was I doing back then with Covid symptoms? The virus had been spreading in China for several months, but didn’t break out in the rest of the world until February.

My own belief is that, somehow or other, I was an early contractor of Covid-19. But how? I live alone, and don’t go out much, and hardly ever visit pubs (particularly in January now that smokers like me have been expelle). I was very unlikely to have got it

Either I got some other bug, or Covid was galloping round the world much faster than anyone knew.

If the latter, then it looks like the whole world got Covid at the same time, and that it wasn’t initially transmitted from person to person. It’s the sort of thing that would happen if the virus arrived from outer space, as suggested by Chandra Wickramasinghe.

I get the impression that the medical profession is completely foxed. They offer contradictory advice. Wear a mask. Don’t wear a mask. Lockdown. Don’t lockdown.

I haven’t really recovered from whatever it was I got. In fact I was in hospital for two weeks back in May. I don’t have as much energy as I used to have: it’s why I no longer post daily like I used to.

It’s said that Boris Johnson hasn’t really recovered from his bout of it either (see Mark Steyn talking to Tucker Carlson).

If so, it seems quite likely that Donald Trump won’t either. And he’s just 30 days away from an election.

Who’s next?

God I hate this new editor.

Posted in Uncategorized | 29 Comments

Posted Without Comment

Posted without comment.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-wales-54328466

The Welsh Government plans to ban smoking in playgrounds by March.

Smoking on the touchlines at children’s football matches is being banned by the Football Association of Wales.
Health Minister Vaughan Gething praised the ban by the FAW and its trust, which supports grassroots football.

“Voluntary bans like this one help protect children from seeing smoking as an acceptable and normal behaviour and can help prevent them from taking up smoking in the first place,” he said.

https://www.standard.co.uk/news/uk/singing-dancing-pubs-bars-banned-coronavirus-laws-a4558486.html

Fury over new ‘draconian’ coronavirus laws which includes ban on loud music, singing and dancing in bars and pubs

https://www.zerohedge.com/political/ron-paul-question-science-go-gulag

“YouTube does not allow content that explicitly disputes the efficacy of the World Health Organization.”

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , | 5 Comments

Killjoy Moral Crusaders

Taking :Liberties:

A leading Labour-run council has banned staff from smoking at their desks if they are working from home, in what campaigners say is an emerging “moral crusade” by local authorities against tobacco lovers.

Hammersmith and Fulham council, which represents one of the country’s richest areas in London, told its staff in guidance that “any part of a private dwelling used solely for work purposes will be required to be smoke-free”

The war on smoking has always been a moral crusade. It’s never been anything else.

It’s never been about Health. How could it have been when the war on smoking saw smokers expelled from pubs, exiled to the cold and wet outdoors?

The simple fact of the matter is that the antismokers hate smoking. They think, like the late Dr W, that smoking is a filthy habit. And they want to put a stop to it. That’s the beginning and the end of it. But they disguise their moral crusade as a Health measure.

They’re concerned with appearances. They don’t like the sight of smoking. They also don’t like the sight of drinking. And they don’t like the sight of obesity. They have a long list of things they don’t like the sight of, or the sound of, or the idea of. And they want to put a stop to all of them.

And they’re killjoys. They disapprove of anything that people enjoy. Food, sex, drinking, smoking, idleness, luxury.

And they of course make a lot of enemies.

And they are prophets of impending doom.

And they claim the moral high ground. They regard themselves as good people, and better than most. They never have any doubts about it.

They seem to multiply in times of prosperity, and decline in times of hardship.

In our prosperous times they are of course numerous, and they seem to be most numerous in America, the most prosperous country in the world. And their current prophecy of doom is that of Global Warming, which is claimed to be a consequence of our current prosperity, as we generate carbon dioxide (usually just called carbon, which is black) with our industry.

Most American killjoys seem to belong to the Democratic party. Hillary Clinton banned smoking in the White House and Michael Bloomberg banned smoking in New York City, and both have run for the Presidency as Democrats. It seems to be Democrats who are usually behind restrictive environmental protection measures like smoking bans. They often call themselves “progressives”, but if progress is measured by wealth and prosperity  and freedom, they are really the enemies of progress.

If such people loathe republican president Donald Trump, it’s because he’s not only very rich, but is ostentatiously and unapologetically rich. And the American economy has boomed during his presidency, with environmental protection slashed. Donald Trump is not a killjoy.

The current coronavirus pandemic provides another excuse for killjoy control freaks to impose draconian restrictions on everyone. But this time they may have gone too far, and made too many enemies, precisely because the new strictures apply to everybody.

Contrary to current polls, I expect Donald Trump to be re-elected in November. It’ll be a big defeat for the killjoys. But they’ll be back. They never really go away.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , | 4 Comments

The Forgotten People

Something Michael Moore said (10:00 minutes):

“I can say that from my end of the political spectrum, we don’t forget people. We’re actually about remembering the people who are forgotten, and fighting for them… The real forgotten people, the people who still don’t have the power, that don’t have the voice: women, people of colour, young people. These are the forgotten people”

Are those really the forgotten people?

Is there any way that they can possibly be the forgotten people?

The very fact that people like Michael Moore are remembering them means that they’re not forgotten. They’re really the unforgotten people.

We have lots and lots of these unforgotten people. Women. Blacks. Jews. Gays and lesbians. Etc, etc. There’s an entire literature attached to each of them. We’re never allowed to forget them for a moment.

It’s true that they once were forgotten. But the forgotten women got the vote a century ago. And the forgotten blacks got civil rights 60 years ago. And forgotten homosexuality was decriminalised 40 or 50 years ago. These are all people who’ve been remembered for a very long time. So how can anyone say that they’re forgotten? If anything they’ve been remembered for far too long.

I think there are lots of better candidates for the truly forgotten. They’re the people who really are forgotten and ignored and despised like women and blacks and gays once were. They’re the people that the likes of Michael Moore never remember.

For just when women and blacks and gays were being given the vote, given new rights, and stopped being persecuted, other people started being excluded and persecuted instead.

For example: smokers.

A century ago smokers could smoke everywhere. Now those rights have been taken away. They can hardly smoke anywhere. And they are robbed with punitive taxation. And nobody listens to them. Nobody pays any attention to them.

Another example: fat people.

Twiggy

A century ago fat people were held in high esteem. Santa Claus or Father Christmas was a beaming fat guy who brought everyone presents on Christmas Day. But over the past century the admired body type has become thin. Remember Twiggy from the 1960s? Fat people are now pressured to lose weight. Fat people  are despised. Fat people have told me that it’s much worse for them than it is for smokers. And I can believe them. In my experience some people are just naturally fat, and some naturally thin, just like some people are naturally short and some naturally tall. I’m naturally thin. My mother used to implore me to eat more. But I stayed thin however much I ate. Don’t ask me why.

There’s an odd relationship between smoking and obesity. Smokers tend not to get fat. Maybe that’s because smoking suppresses appetite. But a century or so ago, particularly during wartime, when everyone was thin and wiry, more or less everyone smoked. It’s really only been over the past 60 years, while people have been stopping smoking, that people have started getting fat. You either smoke and stay thin, or you stop smoking and get fat: you’ll be disapproved of either way.

Smokers are despised and excluded, and fat people are despised and excluded too (although I’ve yet to see any No Fat People signs. Why not?). And both are forgotten. They’re the forgotten forgotten. And there are probably plenty more forgotten forgotten people: I forget who.

The persecution of both smokers and fat people has been carried out in the name of Health – Public Health. The UK National Health Service was created in 1948. The UK government Department of Health was created in 1988. Public Health is a tyrannical new invention. Somehow or other us Brits survived for thousands or years without Public Health. It’s a new religion. In the old religion you died and then went to heaven (or hell): in the new religion you never die. Or you’ll never die if you eat a Healthy Diet, don’t touch Junk Food, get plenty of Exercise, and breathe Smoke-Free Air.

The old religion was run by bishops and priests and monks in monasteries and cathedrals. The new religion is run by doctors and nurses and health experts in hospitals. True believers in the old religion are now regarded as being gullible, believing everything they were told unquestioningly. True believers in the new religion are equally gullible: they believe everything they’re told by doctors.

The old religion ended when the monasteries were closed down, and monks evicted onto the streets. It’ll be the same with the new religion. The hospitals will be closed down, and the doctors and nurses evicted from them. It’ll happen when Public Health becomes even more completely insufferable than it already is. It’ll happen when Public Health has succeeded in excluding and demonising not just smokers and fat people, but everybody else as well.

And with the UK about be locked down yet again because of the current crazy coronavirus panic, we might be approaching the point where absolutely everybody is completely sick and tired of bullying and blackmailing Public Health zealots.

And when they’ve all been swept away, people will be encouraged to enjoy their lives, stop trying to live forever. They’ll be encouraged to eat and drink and smoke. It’ll be a new Restoration after years of oppression by the pinch-faced killjoys of Public Health. And then all the forgotten will be remembered, and all the too-long-remembered will be forgotten.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , | 23 Comments

The Selfish and the Selfless

I guess that Progressives believe in Progress, and Progress is something that makes the world a better place. They think the world can become a better place.

Smoking bans are seen as Progressive. Smoking bans make for a smoke-free world. And ridding the world of smoke (of any kind whatsoever) is seen as Progress.  Clean air is good air, and unclean smoky air is bad air. Cleanliness is next to godliness.

The UK Clean Air Acts of the 1950s were mostly intended to reduce the burning of coal, and to increase electric and gas usage. But once one form of smoke could be outlawed, the way was open to outlaw  every kind of smoke. And that could – and eventually did – include tobacco smoke. So smoking bans were regarded by Progressives as a further extension of the Clean Air Acts. Smoking bans made the world into a cleaner and better place.

But there’s at least one big difference between coal smoke and tobacco smoke: nobody actually liked coal smoke, but lots of people liked tobacco smoke. Nobody ever lit lumps of coal just to produce some smoke: they lit it to generate heat. But smokers never lit tobacco to produce heat: they lit it to generate smoke. Tobacco smoke was what smokers wanted.

And that meant that while Progressives approved of smoking bans, smokers disapproved. With smoking bans, smokers lost the smoke they liked. One bunch of people gained, and another bunch lost. But the smokers’ protests were ignored.

More or less anything can be seen as Progress if the people who don’t like it are ignored.

It might be said that smokers don’t want Progress. Or that smokers don’t believe in Progress. Or that smokers don’t think the world can ever be a better place. It might even be that smokers are people who just want to soothe and calm themselves as they live in a difficult, imperfect world. They’re not trying to make the world into a better place: they’re just trying to make it a bit better for themselves.

Faced with a trying and difficult world, Progressives set out to improve the whole world, while smokers  just try to make it slightly better for themselves. It’s the same with drinking: people feel better after a beer and a cigarette. It doesn’t make the world a better place: it just makes them feel better for a few minutes.

Smokers are often regarded as selfish in their pursuit of their own private, personal good, and Progressive antismokers are seen as unselfish.in their selfless pursuit of the common good.

And it’s from this that the Progressive antismokers acquire their moral superiority: they’re not claiming to act selfishly for their own benefit, but selflessly for the benefit of everybody.

But can anyone act for the benefit of everybody? Is it possible to act for the benefit of everybody while simultaneously disregarding the opinions of everybody else? After all, the opinions of smokers are always disregarded by antismoking Progressives. Anyone who claims to act for the benefit of everybody is also claiming to themselves know what’s better for everybody. And anyone who is claiming to know what’s better for everybody is giving primacy to their own opinion, and this is itself a form of extreme selfishness: I know best. So the supposedly selfless Progressives are actually the most selfish.

Equally, smokers who act solely for their own benefit are not claiming to know what’s good for everyone else. They don’t claim primacy to their own opinion. They allow other people to have their own, differing opinions. In this manner supposedly selfish smokers prove to be selfless: they don’t impose their opinions on everyone else.

People are always acting selfishly all the time. I eat when I want to eat, not when everyone wants to eat. I put on a raincoat when I want to wear one, not when everyone wants to wear one. I go to sleep when I want to sleep. not when everyone wants to sleep. But I don’t expect everyone else to eat when I want to eat, or sleep when I want to sleep. Yet this is what the antismokers want: when they don’t want to smoke, they demand that nobody smoke. And they will make laws to enforce their demand.

Can anyone ever really act selflessly? Can anyone stop being themselves, and start being everyone? No, we can’t. We are all each always helplessly ourselves, and ourselves alone. The only thing we can know about anyone else is what they tell us about themselves. To the extent that we ignore other people’s opinions, to that extent we pay attention only to our own opinion. To the extent that antismokers ignore smokers, to that extent they listen only to themselves,

Posted in Uncategorized | 11 Comments