Disintegration

Does anyone know what’s happening to the UK Labour party? It seems to me to be in process of terminal disintegration. They had an acrimonious leadership election after the general election last year, and they’re having another one in the aftermath of the Brexit vote.

Not that I’m in the least bit bothered. It was, after all, Tony Blair’s Labour government that brought in the UK smoking ban of 1 July 2007, for which 90% of Labour MPs voted – and 95% of Lib Dem MPs. Do you remember the Lib Dems? Silly me, I used to vote Lib Dem as regular as clockwork. But after 95% of them had voted to expel smokers like me from society, I concluded that they were neither Lib nor Dem, and have never voted for them since. I’ve completely lost interest in them. I don’t even know who their current leader is. And I don’t want to know. All I know is that they had about 60 MPs a few years ago, and now they’ve got just 8. I wonder why?

The only UK party that’s still (just about) holding together is the Conservative party. Only about 35% of Conservative MPs voted for the smoking ban. They now have a pro-EU PM with a cabinet full of anti-EU MPs. How long is that likely to last?

It’s not just that the main UK political parties are disintegrating. It’s also that the United Kingdom itself is showing signs of disintegration. Our new Prime Minister, Theresa May, clearly wants to hold the both the Conservative party and the UK together. And she probably wants to hold the EU together too.

And, yes, you guessed, the EU is disintegrating as well. The entire ramshackle ‘project’ is on the rocks.

And the situation isn’t much better in the USA, where the wildcard Donald Trump has overthrown the old leadership of the Republican party, and become its new leader and presidential nominee. And the Democratic party is deeply torn between the establishment Hillary Clinton and the radical Bernie Sanders.

In some ways, it’s all a crisis of top down control. Globalisation is all about the attempt to create a top down global world order. The EU is all about top down control of a new European superstate. And political parties and governments are all about top down control of sovereign states. And smoking bans are prime examples of top down control, of top down micromanagement of ordinary people’s lives.

Yet it seems that the more top down control is being exerted, the more the top down controlling organisations are showing signs of disintegration. Less than 10 years after the EU parliament voted for a European-wide smoking ban, the EU is disintegrating. Is it entirely accidental that at least two (Nigel Farage, Marine Le Pen) of the leaders of anti-EU parties are overt smokers?

The disintegration is also evident in the media. In the past, the news was top down controlled by media outfits as old as the political parties on which they reported. They defined what was and what wasn’t news. But in the internet era, any number of online news outlets (e.g. Drudge, Huffpo) have emerged. And, armed with mobile phone colour video cameras, absolutely anyone can now be simultaneously reporter, editor, and publisher.  Instead of getting their news from one or two sources, people increasingly get it from hundreds of different sources.

In many ways, the campaign battle between Clinton and Trump is one between the old top down megaphone media and the new dispersed internet media. Hillary Clinton’s campaign more or less owns the US mainstream media, and broadcasts carefully-planned multi-million dollar campaign ads. But the same was true of the Republican establishment, and that didn’t stop Donald Trump trouncing the lot of them. Trump spent next to nothing on the megaphone media, and instead relied on instant responses on Twitter and Facebook and Youtube. It takes the Clinton machine days to respond to events that Trump responds to in minutes. Donald Trump versus Hillary Clinton is Cassius Clay versus Sonny Liston.

But if the disintegration is strongest anywhere, it’s right at the bottom, in my experience. Ten years ago, I had a wide circle of long-standing friends. And now they’re all gone, casualties of smoking bans that divided communities and closed pubs and cafes. I’m very far from being the only such casualty, as a survey I helped organise a few years back showed.

And perhaps what we’re seeing is a process of disintegration that started at the bottom of a hitherto-cohesive society, and has now propagated all the way up to the very top. If societies are houses of cards, then all it takes is a few cards knocked out at the bottom for the whole thing to come down in a progressive WTC-style concertina collapse. For when you demonise and marginalise 30% of your political base, it’s not going to be very long before you’ll feel the economic and political and social consequences of doing so.

It’s obvious, really. If you shatter the personal ties of camaraderie and friendship between millions of people, you will also shatter the ties that hold political institutions together. For political institutions – such as political parties or sovereign states – are made up of people. And you don’t need to break all the bonds between everyone to cease to have a cohesive society. You just need to break enough, or weaken enough, to bring the whole card house down.

The top down smoking bans that have been introduced all over the world have been hailed as great successes in the self-congratulatory megaphone media because they didn’t result in immediate riots. But the actual results were far more insidious. The bans shattered social bonds just as effectively as a Boeing 757 shatters the columns inside the World Trade Center building through which it’s ploughing. For a while the badly-weakened building stands, until the fires raging inside weaken enough of the remaining columns and beams to cause them to fail too, so that collapse becomes unstoppable.

In a sense it’s self-correcting. As political institutions disintegrate, it becomes impossible for them to exert top down control. The disintegration of the EU will mark the end of top down EU control. And the disintegration of the UK, should it happen, will mark the end of top down Westminster control. Control will fall into the hands of more and more and smaller and smaller political institutions.

And then maybe… just maybe, as top down control weakens, you’ll see pubs, desperate for customers, starting to flout smoking bans, because there’s no support for them, and no one left to enforce them.

Advertisements

About Frank Davis

smoker
This entry was posted in Uncategorized and tagged . Bookmark the permalink.

17 Responses to Disintegration

  1. Harleyrider1978 says:

    It takes political upheaval for major changes to occur I wouldn’t doubt the UK might even see the smoking ban abolished before the dust settles

  2. Frank Davis says:

    Forgot to mention that Geert Wilders is also a smoker

  3. MikeR says:

    Unless we see a UKIP government – or whatever the party renames itself in the aftermath of Brexit – we will not see the UK smoking ban reformed.

    As to the EU, I don’t think we should be under any illusions – the EU establishment will preside over the utter destruction of the continent rather than abandon their goal of a unified empire controlled by a central authority with nation states abolished,. Only the Eurofanatic’s complete removal from authority will get rid of this evil, undemocratic, Utopian project.

  4. Roobeedoo2 says:

    Institutions that seem solid and forever breakdown in Fourth Turning, Frank. Did you ever read this article from 2007? Written shortly after the implementation of the smoking ban:

    http://www.newstatesman.com/blogs/conference/2007/09/labour-majority-increase

  5. Timothy Goodacre says:

    Time English smoking bans were widely ignored. I’m very sad when i think of all the old folk who used to go down the club at lunchtime and meet their friends for a chat, smoke and pint. All gone now thanks to Deborah Arnott and her chums.

  6. Chester Draws says:

    Problem is there are plenty of people like me who will defend your right to smoke, but not in public enclosed spaces.

    I once had to work in an office with several smokers and it was horrible. I won’t drink in a pub that allows smokers or eat in a restaurant that does. So flouting smoking bans won’t necessarily have the effect you think.

    What you do go your lungs is your business. And second hand smoke won’t kill me. But for many of us having to put up with your stink is simply vile. It’s not just about the public health zealots.

    • Timothy Goodacre says:

      The answer is smoking and no smoking pubs. See which are busier.

    • nisakiman says:

      As Timothy says, there is no necessity for a blanket ban. I’m sure if the ban was rescinded there would still be plenty of places for you to go where your nostrils wouldn’t be offended by the vile stench of tobacco smoke.

      And it would also mean that thousands of pubs destined for the pub graveyard would probably get a new lease of life. According to (the non-smoking) the Pub Curmudgeon’s counter in the sidebar on his blog, 16,169 pubs have closed since the smoking ban. That’s far more than can be justified by the fact that some people like yourself are hypersensitive to tobacco smoke. Most non-smokers are pretty much indifferent to it.

    • Rose says:

      Public oppose pub smoking ban
      2 July, 2007

      “Only half of people in England think the ban on smoking in pubs, which came into effect yesterday, is a good idea, a survey shows.

      The annual British Social Attitudes survey, conducted by the National Center for Social Research, has found that 49% of its respondents believe people should be allowed to smoke freely in pubs or at least in designated smoking areas”

      “Researcher Mark Johnson comments: “That only around half of the public support the ban on smoking in pubs will not be good news for the government ahead of Sunday’s introduction.

      “Even worse, is that it is less popular among their traditional working class constituency.”
      http://www.nursinginpractice.com/article/public-oppose-pub-smoking-ban

  7. west2 says:

    Of note is the rise of the Greens in the US. Dr Jill Stein is clearly trying to grab the Sanders’ crowd. Are the regressives moving away from the establishment in the US in the same way as the Labour party in the UK?

    It has taken a long time for the established parties to start to fall apart. Now it remains to be seen what happens. I think the post sums things up nicely. The NGOs and Charidees also seem to be under pressure.

    Once leaders start smoking again, the worlds problems will be solved! Actually when smoking gets back into pubs then ordinary people can get back to solving the worlds problems just as they did before July 2007 :)

  8. smokingscot says:

    Perhaps of greater interest (than Labour).

    Published today by the Beeb, the list of those wishing to take over from Mr. Farage as UKIP Party Leader.

    Prepare for Steven Woolfe (who has – to date – not stated his position on amending the smoking ban).

    http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-36712733

No need to log in

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s