Moustaches You Can Trust

I switched on the radio today for the first time in over 4 months. Turned out that there’d been some local elections and a referendum on whether to replace something called FPTP with something called AV. I’m not registered to vote, so I didn’t vote.

If I’d had a vote, I’d have used it to vote for FPTP and against all the main parties. My reasoning is simple: I’m sick of people fucking around with our political system. I don’t have any trust in the political class, and if they want to change something as fundamental as how votes are counted, it can only be because they see some thieving advantage to themselves. Because they sure as heck don’t want to represent the people of this country.

How do I know? Because I’m a smoker, and no politician pays any attention to us, even though we make up a quarter of the population. Nor does the media. They ignore us too. We may as well not exist. In fact, as far as they’re concerned, we don’t exist. If they can do that to a quarter of the population, then it can’t be too difficult to ignore everybody else as well.

I thought I was getting pretty disenchanted with politics a year or so ago, but I seem to have become even more disenchanted since then. I don’t want to know what these politicians think, or what they say, or what they do. Because there’s nothing I can do about it, except vote against them whenever I get a chance. I would’ve turned off the radio shortly after I’d turned it on, but it was on the other side of the room, and I couldn’t be bothered to get up and walk over to it. And I’d stopped listening anyway.

It must’ve been like this in East Germany back before German re-unification. Did anyone in East Germany actually listen to Ulbricht and co., or watch him on their Trabant TVs? Probably not. What was the point? There was nothing they could do about him. The Communists would always be re-elected. Well, it’s the same with us now. The professional politicians just keep on being re-elected, and then just go and do whatever the hell they want.

Nobody wanted a smoking ban, and there was no need for it, but we got one anyway. Nobody believes in global warming, but we’re going to get the stupid windmills anyway. Nobody wants to be a member of the EU, but we’re signed up to it anyway.

On days like this, I seriously wonder why anyone votes for any of the three main parties. I heard  today that the Lib Dems had done very badly, and that it was punishment for going into a coalition with the Conservatives, and tearing up their manifesto in order to do so. Really? What did their voters expect? The main parties just promise whatever they think will win them votes, and then do something completely different. Labour did it with their manifesto promise to permit smoking in wet-led pubs. The Conservatives did it when Cameron made a ‘cast-iron’ guarantee for a referendum on the Lisbon Treaty, and then reneged on it (naturally). The Lib-Dems tore up many of their manifesto pledges within minutes of the election last year. They’re all doing it. Why is anyone surprised or angry? If you vote for any of the main parties, you’re more or less telling them to do whatever the hell they like, regardless of what they may have promised before an election. And since they’re going to do that, why vote for one lying party rather than another?

Maybe that’s why the Scots voted for the Scots Nationalists. Because they at least sound like they might really mean what they say, whether people like their policies or not. Same with UKIP. And the BNP. As trust in the main parties collapses, voters will start taking pot luck with Anybody Else.

And this may be why all the politicians seem quite sure that the Lib-Con coalition government will last the full 5 years. It’s because politicians are getting more and more terrified of an increasingly disenchanted and volatile electorate. So they want to minimize the frequency of elections. They’d really prefer that there only be elections at 10 or 20 year intervals. Or, better still, none at all.

The way things are going, all I can see up ahead is increasing voter volatility, as they switch from party to party looking for somebody – anybody – who’ll actually, y’know, represent them. Someone they can trust. They’ll be looking for deeds, not words. Substance rather than spin. Truth rather than lies. They’ll be looking for men of principle. Any principle at all.

There’ll likely be sudden changes in the political landscape, as minor parties attract the huge wandering herds of disenchanted voters. The old parties – the lying parties – will dwindle away. You’ll find surprising new faces elected to power. They’ll be people who mean to do exactly what they say, and not something else. They’ll be people who aren’t prepared to compromise their convictions an iota. They’ll probably have stern faces and jutting jaws.

And, who knows, some of them may even have those trim little moustaches which were quite fashionable 70 or 80 years ago. Not extravagant moustaches that curl up at the ends. Nor soup-strainer moustaches. But moustaches you can trust.

About the archivist

smoker
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

20 Responses to Moustaches You Can Trust

  1. Paul says:

    That’ll be nice.

    There are an awful lot of angry people out there that don’t vote. There are also a lot of people who should, if they had any sense, be questioning why things are the way they are. But they just accept it. Any discussion of any political issue is automatically shut down.

    The powers that be are scared of people who know what’s going on. They pretend that UKIP is a wasted vote but hate the idea that people won’t vote for the main parties on principle.

    Deliberately withholding your vote and telling them why really fucks them off. Good.

  2. Scot says:

    Happy days.

    Stewart Maxwell, the wanker who first tabled the motion of the ban to the Par-lia-mint who was looking to get back into power at Glasgow Eastwood, came third.

    This on an SNP rollover night, say goodnight to the folks Stewart.

    Then the “mother” of the ban, Andy Kerr MSP loses his seat.

    Looking for a directorship of a anti-smoker “charity” no doubt, Hasta la vista Andy.

    And that big erect crowing cock “the thing I’m proudest of is the smoking ban…” jolly Jack McConnell was retiring his seat anyway, so thats another fucking numpty well removed from any harm he can do with political power.

    Bye Jack, thanks for the fucking bad memories…

    Now we’re lumbered wi wee Nicola “the surgeon” Sturgeon and her madcap designs on our “lifestyle choices”, well she will no doubt come to an unhappy end soon hopefully.

    I didn’t vote at all, like yourself I think they all piss in the same pot, and would steal the milk out of your tea, given half a chance and a private members bill…

  3. Paul says:

    One thing though Frank – there was no rise in the UKIP number of councillors this time round. And the BNP was wiped out in Stoke. Traditionally a very BNP area.

    The failed old parties could conceivably say that the rise of ‘protest’ parties does not add up to the ‘disenchantment’ that we talk of out here.

    Could you give an explanation to this? I rather feel like I am openly voicing what everyone else is secretly thinking and they really just want me to shut up.

  4. Walt says:

    Register to vote. Run for office. Vote for yourself.

    Or get Snowdon to run. Vote for him.

    If somebody ran on a credible promise to repeal the ban, to trash the windmills, to stop the “nudging,” and to run from the run-amok gang in Brussels, don’t you believe they’d at least have a crack at attracting enough votes to scare the Usual Suspects?

    • Frank Davis says:

      I don’t know what makes people vote the way they do. I think that mostly it’s habitual. Or they’re concerned about other things. Smoking bans don’t affect the 75% of the population who don’t smoke. And very arguably environmentalism and the EU haven’t affected them too much either. They’ll carry on voting the way they always have until, for one reason or other, it becomes too uncomfortable to continue.

  5. Rose says:

    We are stuck with career politicians, but what we really need are people who would have to be dragged unwillingly to serve the public, shocked by the awesome responsibility of making decisions that would affect others.
    Determined to make things run as smoothly as possible but never stepping above the level of power granted by the public that chose them.

    Retired after 5 years with a very good pension in gratitude.
    If they have done the job well, they will need it to provide for them as they go through therapy.

    • Frank Davis says:

      You’re quite right. It’s one of the paradoxes of politics, it seems, that you do want politicians who ” have to be dragged unwillingly to serve the public”, but you always seem to end up with politicians who can’t wait to order people around and feather their own nests. The former won’t stand for office, I guess, and the latter will.

      It’s maybe something like Gresham’s law: “Bad money drives out good money”.

  6. harleyrider1978 says:

    Totally agree Frank…………………..

  7. harleyrider1978 says:

    Some new stuff Ive just come across rose and the rest……

    Car A/C (Air Conditioning) MUST READ!!!

    Please do NOT turn on A/C as soon as you enter the car.

    Open the windows after you enter your car and then turn ON the AC after a couple of minutes.

    Here’s why: According to research, the car dashboard, seats, air freshener emit Benzene, a Cancer causing toxin (carcinogen – take time to observe the smell of heated plastic in your car).

    In addition to causing cancer, Benzene poisons your bones, causes anemia and reduces white blood cells. Prolonged exposure will cause Leukemia, increasing the risk of cancer. Can also cause miscarriage.

    Acceptable Benzene level indoors is 50 mg per sq. ft.
    A car parked indoors with windows closed will contain 400-800 mg of Benzene.
    If parked outdoors under the sun at a temperature above 60 degrees F, the Benzene level goes up to 2000-4000 mg, 40 times the acceptable level.

    People who get into the car, keeping windows closed will inevitably inhale, in quick succession, excessive amounts of the toxin.
    Benzene is a toxin that affects your kidney and liver.. What’s worse, it is extremely difficult for your body to expel this toxic stuff.

    So friends, please open the windows and door of your car – give time for interior to air out -dispel the deadly stuff – before you enter.

    But,Whats the exposure rate of benzene to a person for fueling a car at gas pump!

    Another one out today

    COLUMBUS, Ohio, May 6 (UPI) — Smokers and non-smokers alike were more apt to leave substance abuse treatment centers after a smoking ban was instituted, researchers say.

    Co-authors Thomas Gregoire of Ohio State University and Gretchen Hammond of Amethyst Inc., both in Columbus, say the study doesn’t mean treatment centers shouldn’t try smoking bans, but it highlights the challenges involved.

    The study found the number of patients who completed a program at the women’s treatment center decreased 28 percentage points — from 70 percent to 42 percent — after the center’s implementation of a tobacco-free policy, Gregoire says.

    “Following the implementation of the new policy, clients were significantly less likely to complete treatment than they were prior to the adoption of tobacco-free policies,” Gregoire says in a statement.

    Tobacco-free treatment facilities began in New Jersey in the 1990s but many treatment facilities tend to allow patients to smoke because some say treating a person for smoking in addition to other substance abuse would be too difficult and result in failure, Gregoire says.

    “Despite the growing body of research about the problems of smoking in treatment facilities, the use of tobacco still retains a protected status in the addictions community and is largely untreated,” Gregoire says.

    The study appears in the Journal of Social Work Practice in the Addictions.

    Read more: http://www.upi.com/Health_News/2011/05/06/Some-leave-rehab-after-smoking-ban/UPI-37921304738569/#ixzz1LfflUV9W

  8. harleyrider1978 says:

    All this is in a small sealed room 9×20 and must occur in ONE HOUR.

    For Benzo[a]pyrene, 222,000 cigarettes To meet osha pel on benzene

  9. Morgan says:

    Frank:

    I nicked this entire post and copied it to here:

    http://wiganpatriot.blogspot.com/2011/05/moustaches-you-can-trust.html

    Hope you don’t mind too much.

    Thanks.

  10. Gary K. says:

    “On days like this, I seriously wonder why anyone votes for any of the three main parties.”

    Mostly, they don’t.

    In 2008,the last Presidential in the USA, only 74% of the adults registered to vote and only 64% of those registered bothered to actually vote.

    Our exalted Poobah was put in to office by the wishes of 30% of the adults!!

    On the years of non-presidential elections, as low as 20% of the registered voters will actually vote.

  11. Gary K. says:

    OT; but, am just curious.

    How much does the nicotine for your E-cig cost?

    If nicotine were worth it’s weight in Gold, we inhale about 5 cents worth per cigarette.
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nicotine

    The amount of nicotine inhaled with tobacco smoke is a fraction of the amount contained in the tobacco leaves. (an average cigarette yields about 1 mg of absorbed nicotine)

    1 mg = 1,000th of a gram

    There are 28.4 grams per ounce.

    1 mg = 1/28,400th of an ounce.

    Gold is worth $1,500 per ounce = 150,000 cents.

    150,000 divided by 28,400 = 5.3 cents per cigarette.

  12. Mr A says:

    The UKIP vote may have remained unchanged because these were only local elections. When I marched down to vote I had every intention of voting UKIP but there wasn’t a candidate standing. In fact there wasn’t even a Lib Dem! All we had were the choices of three Tories and a Labour.

    We really have to wait for the Euro elections and the next general election to truly determine how UKIP are doing.

  13. Junican says:

    Oh dear! so many matters arise!

    Am I not right in believing that, not long ago, the names of candidates for election DID NOT have the political parties that they represented mentioned? Candidates were identified by name only – and that was not very long ago. For some reason that I do not remember, a decision was made by Parliament that it was OK for ‘the political party that a candidate purports to represent’ to be stated on the ballot form.

    Is it not easy to see how, by this minor looking change, the whole emphasis of WHOM one is voting for can be changed from the person to the political party? Is it then any wonder that Political Parties want to make another minor change and remove the actual name of the candidate and replace that name with a Political Party? On the face of it, the argument that voters vote for representatives of Political Parties seems reasonable. Why not have ‘proportional representation’? Why not have the number of MPs for each party decided by the number of votes cast for each party?

    There is one clear and obvious objection and that is that there would no longer be any point in having constituencies. But there is also another objection.

    The implication of voting for a Party is that all the members of the party are of like mind. But the reality is that they are not. The reality of such a system is that it is a recipe for confusion and uncertainty, unless the system becomes a dictatorship. God knows, it is bad enough as it is.

    The serious problem, as I see it, is lack of accountability. MPs should be accountable to their constituents for how they vote and not to their parties. I wonder, for example, what would have happened in my constituency if my local MP had had to account for voting for the smoking ban when, after 6 months or so, pubs were closing down in huge numbers in the constituency? And, could that vote be reversed?

    We are living in strange times. The AV referendum was a Politician derived nonsense. Even it it had been agreed, it would not have changed anything because it was addressing the wrong problem.

    We have yet to see where Democracy is going to. Certainly, the smoking ban has shown without any doubt whatsoever that democracy as we know it at the moment stinks.

  14. Lysistrata says:

    Party affiliation was added to candidates’ names some – ooh – many years ago.
    I used to be on poll duty, outside, complete with rosette (along with the other parties).
    Before then, many a voter used to come up to me and say before going in: “what’s the name of the nice young person I should vote for?” Same for the other parties.

No need to log in

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.