Slavery and Other Inequities

Slavery seems to have become a hot topic recently. A lot of Americans seem to be deeply ashamed to discover that it was practised in much of the United States until about 1865.

Why the belated shame? Why now? Are Italians ashamed of the Roman empire, in which slavery was also practised? Or Greeks ashamed of the practice in Athens? They don’t seem to be. In fact they seem to be proud of the Colosseum and the Parthenon and Plato and Aristotle and Virgil and Cicero.

Yet slavery lasted far longer in Greece and Rome than it did in the Americas.

Perhaps the answer is that Greeks and Romans couldn’t be expected to know any better, while civilised and cultured Christian Englishmen were expected to know that it was wrong to force people to work for them, and they should never have done it. And that’s why the statue of the slaveowning Edward Colston was recently torn down and thrown in Bristol’s river Avon, in an extraordinary wave of public guilt, 200 years after it had been erected,

But I think that, but for the fact that we now have numerous engines to do the hard work of lifting and transporting all the materials we use, we would still have slavery in Britain. It’s thanks to Rolls Royce and engineers like Isambard Kingdom Brunel that we have iron ships and bridges and trains and cars and planes. But for them we’d still be working as hard as the Greeks and Romans. and most of us would be slaves. What else could happen when everybody has to work from dawn to dusk every day? Isn’t it inevitable that in that circumstance very few people would be free to do as they please? We should be thanking our lucky stars that we have this freedom, not suffering from guilt that our forebears never saw it.

People must work to survive, and this work occupies some fraction of their lives. If they need to work for 95% of their days, then either everybody must work 95% of the time, or 95% of them must work all the time. The former is a condition of perfect equity, and the latter is one of extreme inequity, in which some are slaves and others are free.

Why is it that it is this latter circumstance of inequity that has been the norm throughout recorded history?

One possible explanation: in equitable societies in which all work is shared equally, nobody has any incentive to find quicker ways to do the necessary work, because they will always end up working just as hard as everyone else. It is only in inequitable societies that anyone can become richer (or freer) than anyone else. And so innovation and invention will happen faster in inequitable societies than in equitable societies. And there will be a tendency for equitable societies to be static societies whose condition never improves.

A variant of this explanation is that if there is a division of labour, in which different people do different work, then those people who perform one task = e.g. of pottery or carpentry – will always become more skilled in that task than those people who perform multiple tasks, and these skilled workers will complete their tasks more rapidly than the unskilled.

In addition, the unskilled will always want to learn for themselves these various skills, and so skilled workers will become teachers of unskilled students, and there will arise an instructive hierarchy of masters and pupils. And this hierarchy will bring with it another kind of inequity.

In this manner inequity will gradually increase until the extreme is reached with society composed of masters (teachers) of various ranks and slaves (pupils).

And this has happened throughout history everywhere. It’s why there armies with generals at the top, and private soldiers at the bottom, and a hierarchy of ranks in between. It’s why there are chief executives at the top of companies, and unskilled workers at the bottom. And it’s why there popes at the top of religions, and all manner of vicars and priests above the ordinary laity at the bottom.

But this hierarchical society can only endure if there is always the possibility of promotion within its ranks. If slaves and their children are to remain slaves all their lives, and aristocracies become heredity, with power retained in families, automatically passed from fathers to sons, regardless of their competence, then incompetence will gradually prevail at every level of society, and life will get harder for everyone, and it will likely end with a revolt in which the entire system is dissolved and replaced with a new one.

And this is what happened in the United States, where slaves remained slaves all their lives, with little or no hope of promotion into the ranks of the slave-owning aristocracy whose families ruled America.

The American Civil War was in many ways a repetition of the Revolutionary War of independence from British rule, by Americans who had no way of being promoted into the ranks of the hereditary British aristocracy. In the intervening century there had emerged a new and very rich American hereditary aristocracy, and a permanent underclass beneath it with slaves at the very bottom. It was now the turn of this underclass to revolt against this new aristocracy, just as that aristocracy had once revolted against British rule.

And perhaps now history is once again repeating itself, with a new super-rich aristocracy (“the 1 %”) presiding over a large and growing subclass of people with little or no prospect of promotion in a society in which their are few jobs in which to find such promotion. And there are few jobs because innovation and  industrialisation has removed the jobs. So new pressures have begun to build up. The new underclass may not consist of slaves, but they are no more able to improve their lot than slaves once were.

If slavery has become topical, it is perhaps because extreme inequity has again appeared, and historical slavery (and sexism and racism and homophobia) acts as a proxy for this new inequity, which has yet to acquire its own name, and so uses another. Instead of a society in which 95% of people need to work, there is one in which only 5% need to work, and in its own way this is as inequitable as what came before.





About Frank Davis

This entry was posted in Uncategorized and tagged , , . Bookmark the permalink.

14 Responses to Slavery and Other Inequities

  1. Clicky says:

  2. EG says:

    If you watch old movies they never worked in like 1955. They smoked, ate and dranked. How did they get anything done? They had no google to research the a new disease that might kill them.

  3. Joe L. says:

    Over the past five months, we have seen at least 10 independent studies from multiple countries around the world which indicate that smokers are both less likely to contract COVID-19 and less likely to suffer severe symptoms if they do contract it. None of these studies were reported on by the US mainstream media, and by only a couple media outlets in the UK.

    This week, the WHO released their “expert” opinion on the matter, and of course, they claim the exact opposite. It’s interesting to note that they did not provide any numbers indicating how much more risk they believe smokers incur. This brief article only makes mention of the French study to the contrary, and makes it sound like an anomaly, when in reality there are multiple other studies which corroborate its findings, and no studies I have seen which support the WHO’s claim.

    WHO says smoking linked to higher risk of severe illness and death from coronavirus

    LONDON: The World Health Organization says smoking is linked to a higher risk of severe illness and death from the coronavirus in hospitalized patients, although it was unable to specify exactly how much greater those risks might be.

    In a scientific brief published this week, the U.N. health agency reviewed 34 published studies on the association between smoking and COVID-19, including the probability of infection, hospitalization, severity of disease and death.

    WHO noted that smokers represent up to 18% of hospitalized coronavirus patients and that there appeared to be a significant link between whether or not patients smoked and the severity of disease they suffered, the type of hospital interventions required and patients’ risk of dying.

    In April, French researchers released a small study suggesting smokers were at less risk of catching COVID-19 and planned to test nicotine patches on patients and health workers, but their findings were questioned by many scientists at the time who cited the lack of definitive data.

    WHO says “the available evidence suggests that smoking is associated with increased severity of disease and death in hospitalized COVID-19 patients.” It recommends that smokers quit.

    This is clearly just more unscientific Antismoking propaganda from the WHO. Does anyone trust the WHO any longer, after they were proven to have lied and spread misinformation about COVID-19 since the original outbreak in China?

  4. waltc says:

    Just got around to reading yesterday’s “Roots.” That’s some gorgeous and evocative writing. Have you ever thought of writing a memoir about places you’ve lived in an unrecoverable past?

    • Frank Davis says:

      I enjoyed writing that post. In fact I woke up in the middle of the night to write it. And I was deliberately trying to write some rich English (something I’m not usually trying to do), so it was a blog post like no other, and I’ve been gratified that several people recognised it as such.

      I’d like to do it again. I could also write about living in Tripoli in Libya, and Asmara in Eritrea, and in Rio de Janeiro in Brazil. They’re also places where I once lived, and of which I retain strong memories I’ve also got memories of crossing the Atlantic by ship. And of course there are my memories of England. And short trips to Egypt and Greece and France and Japan.

  5. penseiveat says:

    As I understand it, Colston made his money from cotton, the production of which was linked to the slave trade, rather than him actually owning slaves.
    Compare that to those protesters today wearing overpriced trainers made by young children in the Indian sub continent who are paid a pittance for working long hours. Isn’t that a connection to a form of slavery? Perhaps these protesters should throw themselves into canals and other waters (oh, please do)? The problem is getting them to see this.
    This has shown that their anger and feelings of self righteousness is selective, making them hypocrites.

  6. RdM says:

    Ennio Morricone, OMRI[1] (Italian: [ˈɛnnjo morriˈkoːne]; 10 November 1928 – 6 July 2020) was an Italian composer, orchestrator, conductor, and trumpet player who wrote music in a wide range of styles. Morricone composed over 400 scores for cinema and television, as well as over 100 classical works.


    I have the 2CD Crime and Dissonance .

    The only version of this track I found on YT was this, but for the audio ~

    Making love again ?

    I’m reading scifi again too.

    Ennio Morricone

    Good night, from this side of the terminator…

  7. RdM says:

    Listening to the live ISS stream now, as well as reading hi def sci fi

  8. Dr Evil says:

    I have often thought how different life would be if Leonardo Da Vinci had put his superb genius to work designing an actual functional engine with designs that could be manufactured. A steam engine of some sort.

No need to log in

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.