Smoking Roll-ups

The first thing I read today:

His wife, Sam, packed up their life by herself because Mr Cameron said he could not bear to go back to Downing Street.

After packing the last box, she put on some music, rolled a cigarette and danced around the kitchen – just as Mrs May and her husband Philip walked in. “I roared with laughter,” he added.

I knew David Cameron smoked, although he concealed the fact throughout his premiership. I didn’t know his wife smoked too. Furthermore I didn’t know she smoked roll-ups. Nor did I know that she smoked them indoors.

Theresa May was another smoker. Maybe her husband was too. Perhaps they were all smoking cigarettes in the kitchen of 10, Downing Street that day.

None of them did anything for Britain’s smokers, of course. In fact they continued with their persecution. They were all hypocrites, publicly pretending not to be smokers while they privately carried on smoking.

David Cameron said that the government would do the bidding of the British people in the EU referendum. But the first thing he did was to resign as Prime Minister when the result wasn’t what he expected. And that was another piece of hypocrisy. Saying one thing, doing something else.

I spent a while talking with an ex-paratrooper yesterday afternoon, sat in the sunshine outside a local pub. He was smoking roll-ups just like mine. At one point he asked me whether I put filters in them, and I said I didn’t. He seemed very concerned about this. “You know what the consequences will be.”

It emerged that this battered and grizzled Falklands veteran believed everything that he’d ever heard about the dangers of smoking.

I said that I no longer believed anything I was told about tobacco or alcohol or sugar or salt. Because, well, I don’t.

But he seemed unable to contemplate the idea that it was all nonsense, and repeated his dire warning.

Afterwards I wondered why some people were so credulous, and why some were so incredulous. Perhaps it was just different understanding, different experience. He was someone who could strip down and re-assemble an AK47 in a matter of seconds – something I wouldn’t have had a clue how to do. But I was someone who could solve simultaneous equations in a matter of seconds – something he probably wouldn’t have had a clue how to do. I trust soldiers to know what they’re doing, and he trusted mathematicians and researchers to know what they were doing. So he believed what the boffins told him about the dangers of smoking, and an ex-university researcher like me didn’t.

It’s probably the same everywhere. The more you know about something, the more critical you become. So if you’re an expert chef, and you sit down in a restaurant somewhere, you’ll immediately notice if the potatoes are undercooked, and the cabbage overcooked, and the mustard too sharp. You notice because you’ve been doing it all your life. And if you haven’t been doing it all your life, you don’t notice: you just eat what’s put in front of you.

The grizzled old war veteran may have possessed many skills, but he knew next to nothing about science and research. So he just ate was put in front of him. He swallowed it all unquestioningly.

A politician like David Cameron no doubt also possesses many skills, but he probably knows next to nothing about science and research. So he probably swallows what he’s told unquestioningly as well. And so does more or less everyone else.

About Frank Davis

This entry was posted in Uncategorized and tagged , . Bookmark the permalink.

12 Responses to Smoking Roll-ups

  1. Timothy Goodacre says:

    Cameron and wife are well known smokers and perhaps other substances as well. Good riddance to the hypocrites.

  2. RdM says:

    “whether I put filters in them, and I said I didn’t. “

    I personally use filters in slim rollups, RYO, because it gives me a handle, something to hold on to, and I waste less tobacco. I can see when I’m getting down to the filter, and I’m not left with a soggy butt (roach?) to deal with later.

    I clip off burnt ends and recycle clean butts when I’m running low.
    I enjoy overflowing ashtrays.

    It’s as though I’m at war, on rations.

    • RdM says:

      And I tend to park them with 1/3rd left, I’ve noticed.
      So there is plenty left to harvest, mostly
      Until I can afford a new packet.

      We are at war, in these senses.

      Forbidden, or excessively priced tobacco.

  3. Isn’t 10 downing street classed as a workplace? Shouldn’t Sam Cam get a fifty quid fine for smoking in it?

  4. Smoking Lamp says:

    Slightly O/T: The antismoking machine is on a crusade or perhaps more aptly as Frank describes it at war with smokers and tobacco companies. They believe their crusade is god for all because they have tunnel vision and see only their partisan perspective. This article at a California paper sums it up. The antismokers seek smoking bans–in tis case at beaches–because they hate cigarettes. It’s worth a read for even a comment (if they will accept dissenting views). Check out: “The Sordid History of the California State Beach Smoking Ban: Part I – The Stolen Bills”

    • Mark Jarratt says:

      Well yeah! Any reference to the fabricated myth of harm from 2nd hand smoke in the open air is conspicuous by its absence, and the author and/or sub-editor is in need of remedial instruction upon the correct use of apostrophes, or is that apostrophe’s.
      The “litter” claim is another smokescreen, pardon poor allierative pun, for the intolerance of lifestyle controllers, similar to the self appointed park ranger who went out of her busybody way at Lake Pedder in the remote Tasmanian wilderness to remonstrate with me, claiming smoking is illegal because it “causes” bushfires. When challenged to cite the relevant regulation, the odious bully had no response. The great majority of Australian bushfires result from lightning strike, but as usual the tunnel vision bullies ignore any facts or evidence contradicting their prohibitionist preconceptions…but I’m preaching to the converted again. 📣

      • Smoking Lamp says:

        Mark, You are right. In the case of littering, that is already a violation under california law. And cigarettes butts are not a major cause of wildfire–especially at the beach, as California wildfires traditionally burn toward the beach due to natural terrain. The majority of wildfires in California are caused by lightning strike, downed power lines or arson. These are all pretexts for persecuting smokers. SL

        • Mark Jarratt says:

          Thanks SL. Maybe I am paranoid, but it’s quite possible anti-tobacco zealots commit arson as another vector for smoker blaming and shaming. Then again just because you’re paranoid doesn’t mean they’re not out to get you! 🤯

  5. Pingback: Who Dares Wins | Frank Davis

No need to log in

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.