Putin

A day or two back I watched an interview of Vladimir Putin by the Financial Times. I was a bit surprised to be able to watch it at all, because the FT is behind a paywall. At the beginning it says:

The Financial Times is the first major international newspaper to be granted an interview with the Russian leader for 16 years. Here is the exclusive interview with editor Lionel Barber and Moscow bureau chief Henry Foy in full.

The trouble with more or less all world leaders is that they are only ever seen briefly, and then usually making speeches, and so you never get to find out what they’re like.

But this interview lasts a full hour and a half, ranges over a great many matters, and Putin does most of the talking. The three of them are sat at a table, one asking questions in English, and the other replying in Russian (with English subtitles). It would seem clear that Putin’s grasp of English is not very good, because after he is asked a question there is a long pause while he listens to the translation from English to Russian of the questions he’s just been slowly asked. I wasn’t sure how well the FT staffers understood Putin, but they made notes as he spoke, which gave the impression that they understood what he was saying – but it could be that the long pauses while they listened to the translations from Russian to English were edited out.

The main thing that I took from the interview was that Vladimir Putin has a sense of humour. For there were little flashes of humour throughout the interview.

I found the principal interviewer, who was asking most of the questions, to be rather tiresome, because he was always trying to catch Putin out, to box him into a corner (although he never succeeded). So Putin came over as being very quick on his feet, very ready with answers. He didn’t confer with anyone either. He came up with all the answers himself.

He referred to other world leaders, such as Donald Trump, as “partners” rather than rivals. The world he depicted was one in which world leaders were all working together, more or less in agreement with each other. Given the opportunity to criticize Trump, Putin didn’t. Although he thought that Angela Merkel had made a “cardinal error” in inviting migrants to Germany.

One thing I didn’t quite understand was why he regarded the disintegration  of the Soviet Union as a terrible disaster. As he put it, it was a disaster because about 20 million Russians found themselves living in new states in which they were a minority (Ukraine would be one of these new states, I suppose). I couldn’t really quite see why that was such a disaster. Perhaps it was simply that there was a loss of status?

He also spoke (starting 1 hour and 9 minutes in) about the failure of liberalism in the West. By this I think he meant what I would call progressivism, because modern “liberals” are in no sense classical liberals. He said that the liberal elites had lost the support of the people. He said the same sort of thing had happened in the Soviet Union, in which ordinary people had ceased to have any belief in communism and their political elites, and so didn’t act to prevent the break-up of the Soviet Union. He said that they’d thought that things couldn’t get any worse than they already were, but they soon found out when the Soviet Union broke up that things got much, much worse.

The conversation also covered economics and Syria and China and North Korea. But for me the really good thing about it was that it provided an insight into Putin the man, talking conversationally about stuff for an hour or two. It brought him into focus. Other world leaders would do well to do the same thing, if they want people to know what they’re like, how they think, what concerns them.

Anyway, I thoroughly recommend watching this interview. And having watched it once, I’ve half a mind to watch it again.

About Frank Davis

smoker
This entry was posted in Uncategorized and tagged . Bookmark the permalink.

7 Responses to Putin

  1. Watched and I endorse your view. He showed great insight about the consequence of a failed state, and the need for goverments to avoid this.

  2. Algernon Struthers says:

    “A disaster” because the Soviets had systems in place, faulty sure, totalitarian sure, but everyone knew the system and within reason, played by the rules, such as they were. Then suddenly that system fell to pieces. There was no system anymore and people were at odds making up new systems – to make a long story short.
    Putin, I think, whatever else he is – is holding the ramshackle, often corrupt restructure of Russia together, assuring Russians that there is order; that things are working, and we are noble Russians, and with nation building parades, etc, and so, continually moving Russia away from possible anarchy.
    Trump’s doing the same for the USA, a system running on fumes.
    When any system breaks down and is rebuilt, the transition period is often considered a disaster. ‘Transitions’ are state-of-flux; change; restructuring, and there will be confusion; uncertainty; doubts; worries, etc, which Putin was expressing regarding the transition period.

    • Dmitry says:

      Absolutely correct, Algernon. But it’s not only about ethnic Russians becoming minorities in other states. It’s also because each and every new state of the ex-USSR now is worse off, than in the USSR, with one exception of Kazakhstan – and another exception of Russia itself. Then, do not forget that the moment these new nations got their nationhood, they started wars with each other, like Armenia and Azerbaijan, or civil wars, like Georgia and Ukraine. Or they are losing their population (people go West or to Russia), like the tiny Baltic states and others.
      I happen to disagree with Putin, I think that the demise of the British empire was a bigger disaster, since there were more lives lost or shattered. Just look at the India-Pakistan horror, that’s more people dead than in all the post-USSR wars. But Putin somehow does not know enough of the British history, maybe.

      • Algernon Struthers says:

        Thx Dmitry. I have an acquaintance in Kazakhstan who is very pro-Russian, precisely as you’ve pointed out.
        I guess “the disaster” of the Soviets couldn’t have been planned for, even if it was foreseen.

  3. Sackerson says:

    Whihc of our politicians can talk sense for an hour and a half together?

  4. Smoking Lamp says:

    O/T Recently there has been discussion at Simon Clark’s blog ‘Taking Liberties’ about hospital trusts enacting smoking bans without apparent statutory authority. That bureaucratic overreach is now rearing its ugly head in the US.

    The Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) has announced that it is imposing a smoking ban as of October 1, 2019 eliminating all designated smoking areas at all VA hospitals. This ban is being imposed based on the VA ‘smoke-free policy.’ The VA claims a time of $50 will be levied on persons that violate the ban.

    The problem is the ‘smoke-free policy’ directly conflicts with existing statutory law. That is the Veterans Health Care Act of 1992 mandates that VA facilities maintain designate smoking areas (there are currently about 1,000 outdoor smoking areas and 15 indoor smoking areas at VA facilities across the US. In addition to that statutory requirement collective bargaining agreement s require the VA to provide designated smoking areas for employees.

    Now we see the tobacco control extremists are ignoring existing law to impose their draconian bans. This must be stopped. Check out this expose by “‘Stars and Stripes’ on this bureaucratic overreach: https://www.stripes.com/news/us/department-of-veterans-affairs-new-smoke-free-policy-doesn-t-apply-to-employees-1.590159

    Harley must be rolling over in his grave! Tobacco control must be destroyed!

  5. Pingback: Multilingual | Frank Davis

No need to log in

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.