The Self-Destruction of Tobacco Control

I collect “plain packaging” these days. Because I imagine that one day that there will be a black museum filled with them, and with other relics of the war on smokers. Hushed groups of children, some of them crying, will be led around them by schoolteachers who tell them: “This is what they did to tobacco smokers back then.”

The name – “plain packaging” – is itself a lie, of course, because there’s nothing in the least bit plain about this packaging. It’s covered in lurid and obscene images and shouted warnings. And it’s not just that the name is a lie, but that all the messages and images are also lies.

And what is being done here, with this “plain packaging”? A product – in this case tobacco – is being completely defaced. It’s being vandalised. It may as well be being smeared with excrement. And we are being told not what the manufacturers of the product think of it, but what its critics and enemies think of it. And they cover it with messages of hate. They cover a product with negative advertising against it, designed to deter anyone from buying it.

If the same thing was being done to corn flakes or motor vehicles or perfumes, then everything would be covered in obscene images and shouted messages. Corn Flakes Kill. Cars Crush Children, Perfume Stinks. and so on. It’s possible to imagine a world in which there is no positive advertising in favour of anything, but only negative advertising that defames and defiles and degrades.

And that would be a very ugly world.

But that is what Tobacco Control is creating. In place of a former world filled with lovingly crafted, beautiful adverts for all sorts of products, they’re creating a world full of hate-filled, ugly adverts. And these spiteful, lying, obscene anti-adverts actually tell nothing about the products they deface, but speak volumes about the sick, lying, dirty minds of the people in Tobacco Control who created them. After all, they are the authors of these messages and images. And they are fully responsible for them.

And so “plain packaging” advertises to the world the mindset of Tobacco Control. It tells the world exactly how nasty and vicious they all are. And because their obscene images are now plastered over hundreds of millions of tobacco products, this anti-advertising programme is telling hundreds of millions of people just what bullying bastards they all really are.

The anti-advertising is supposed to be for smokers’ eyes only, but plenty of other people are going to see the nasty things. And what is some non-smoker or child who comes across these images and messages likely to think when they see these obscenities? They’ll be shocked. They’ll be shocked in the same way as they are shocked when they come across real pornography.

So these ugly bullets that Tobacco Control are firing in their millions at smokers will be hitting non-smokers just as hard as they hit any smokers. In fact, they will have a far greater impact on non-smokers than smokers, because smokers quickly learn to avert their eyes, and keep their heads down. It’s the non-smokers and the children who are likely to the most profoundly shocked and dismayed.

The ugliness that Tobacco Control is spewing into the world in the form of “plain packaging” has little or no effect on hardened veteran smokers. If anything, non-smokers are likely to feel a little sympathy for smokers who must live every day with their tobacco packets covered with such ghastly images and peremptory orders, and wonder what life would be like if corn flakes packages and bars of soap and pints of milk were similarly defaced. They may also feel  a similar sympathy for smokers who must stand outdoors in all weathers in the street to smoke. The more that smokers are bullied, the more that they will attract sympathy.

This plain packaging also gives the lie (yet another lie!) to the idea that there is a powerful entity in the world called “Big Tobacco”. For quite obviously Tobacco Control is far more powerful than “Big Tobacco”  if it can deface every single product the latter produces, and do so in every country in the world. Tobacco Control likes to portray itself as fighting an heroic, uphill battle against an industrial superpower, but the reality is that it is Tobacco Control that is the superpower bully, and Big Tobacco is its punched and beaten and bloodied victim lying helpless on the street.

And does Tobacco Control do any good at all? The tobacco companies at least manufacture a product that people want to buy, even if it is now covered in obscenities. But Tobacco Control produces absolutely nothing. Or it produces nothing but the obscenities it prints on tobacco packets. Tobacco Control is entirely destructive and vandalistic. And so while tobacco companies offer a wide range of choices of different sorts of tobacco, Tobacco Control always acts to remove all choice. Smoking bans always negate freedom and choice. Tobacco Control brings only the choiceless world of No Smoking.

And so the war of Tobacco Control upon smokers and tobacco companies is a conflict between a retreating world of freedom and truth and beauty and companionship, and an advancing world of constraint and lies and ugliness and isolation. But the more successful that Tobacco Control becomes, and the uglier and nastier it succeeds in making the world, the more obvious how nasty and ugly and mendacious Tobacco Control really is will become manifest to almost everybody. And so the triumph of Tobacco Control will also be its defeat, because Tobacco Control is gradually destroying itself.

About Frank Davis

smoker
This entry was posted in Uncategorized and tagged , . Bookmark the permalink.

10 Responses to The Self-Destruction of Tobacco Control

  1. roobeedoo2 says:

    ‘It’s possible to imagine a world in which there is no positive advertising in favour of anything, but only negative advertising that defames and defiles and degrades.’

    Sounds like political advertising. And, yes, it is extremely ugly.

  2. Timothy Goodacre says:

    I agree totally Frank. I prefer to buy my cigarettes in Austria and Switzerland where branding is still allowed.

  3. beobrigitte says:

    I collect “plain packaging” these days.

    Me, too. I’ll swap the “plain packaging” with the diabetic leg ulcer picture for the Spanish guy in ITU on a ventilator who then later sued as he was in hospital due to a road traffic accident and the picture was taken (and used by the eager anti-smokers) without his permission.

    The ugliness that Tobacco Control is spewing into the world in the form of “plain packaging” has little or no effect on hardened veteran smokers.

    I’m shocked! ………….. Not. I just would like to have a collection of all pictures and screeching health warnings. I definitely need the warning that smoking causes impotence as I do wonder how on earth we, the baby-boomer generation, were created.

    This plain packaging also gives the lie (yet another lie!) to the idea that there is a powerful entity in the world called “Big Tobacco”.

    ….. and poor Big Tobacco control is helpless. *yawn*
    That lie has had it’s time.

    But the more successful that Tobacco Control becomes, and the uglier and nastier it succeeds in making the world, the more obvious how nasty and ugly and mendacious Tobacco Control really is will become manifest to almost everybody. And so the triumph of Tobacco Control will also be its defeat, because Tobacco Control is gradually destroying itself.

    I would like to reserve a seat in the first row as not to miss any of the spectacle!

    • Dmitry Kosyrev says:

      Have I mentioned that by now I not only have a complete collection of funny pictures (the Russian version of them), but also a column written on each of them, tracing the origin of their dubious claims? And, guess what, ALL of them are based on fakes.
      To add, Rose has helped me to go the sourse in severaL cases.

  4. Joe L. says:

    The so-called “Progressive” vision of Utopia is a disgusting one where anything and everything will be plastered in warning labels to protect us from ourselves. Aside from tobacco warning labels, another prime example is the ubiquitous “Parental Advisory label” which has been defacing the cover art of records, cassettes and compact discs in America since 1990 and in Britain since 2011.

    This was the brainchild of Tipper Gore, wife of the man who would later introduce the world to the “Global Warming” fearmongering campaign (and profit mightily from it). And Tipper Gore didn’t stop with music. She later went on to attempt censoring video games because she believed they were too violent.

    • beobrigitte says:

      This was the brainchild of Tipper Gore, wife of the man who would later introduce the world to the “Global Warming” fearmongering campaign (and profit mightily from it).
      And Tipper Gore didn’t stop with music. She later went on to attempt censoring video games because she believed they were too violent.

      Did Tipper have anything to do with “Tom&Jerry” and “Roadrunner” turning from being incredibly funny to incredibly boring? (And, no, I never tried to copy any of Coyote Karl’s [Wiley Coyote] ideas and neither did I – or anyone I know – become interested in pranking with TNT…)

  5. slugbop007 says:

    My father smoked Pall Malls and Chesterfields all his life, married 5 or 6 times, bore 20 children and lived into his mid eighties. Impotence? TC is tilting at windmills.

    slugbop007

  6. slugbop007 says:

    My mother smoked Lucky Strikes and I weighed almost nine pounds at birth. Another myth that should be dismissed.

    slugbop007

  7. Actually, not every country in the world — in the US, apparently capitalism still beats ideology; the only thing on cigarette pks in the US are those maybe-true/maybe-not warnings from the Surgeon General.

    However I salute you for this article, and I hope you’re correct that increasing oppression of smokers will cause increased sympathy for them, but I fear it’s not true — there are just so many lies about smoking that people say “everybody knows” — it’s a travesty.

    I’m no longer a smoker myself, but when I see a group of them hanging outdoors in a cloud of smoke, I still consider them “my people” — because in order to vape, I’d have to go hang with them in that cloud of smoke… and while I KNOW very well that it’s not dangerous… it doesn’t smell good. So I choose to not join them, but go elsewhere. But the fact that tobacco smoke smells bad to non-smokers is NO reason to treat smokers like highly-contagous lepers or terrorists wearing suicide vests.

No need to log in

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.