Anti-votes and Hate Crimes

I’ve been a bit fixated on the US midterm elections for the past week or so. So I’m glad they’re over. Now I’ll maybe be able to think about something else. The provisional result:

US midterms usually see a low turnout of voters of around 30%. But this time there were reports of a much higher turnouts, in some cases 70%. So it looks like there was a Blue wave of Democrats, but also a Red wave of Republicans, and they more or less cancelled each other out.

This election was very much a referendum on Donald Trump. The US mainstream media made it into that. They’ve been completely fixated on him for the past 3½ years. So Americans were voting yesterday either for Trump or against him, even though his name wasn’t on the ballot papers anywhere.

But there’s an interesting asymmetry here. Because while you can vote for somebody, you can’t actually vote against them. You can only vote for somebody else. And that means that when somebody popular comes along, who wins lots of supporters, those supporters can vote for him, but nobody can vote against him. They have to vote for somebody else. And if there are a lot of other candidates, the anti-vote is likely to get distributed among them, and thereby diluted.

And that would seem to mean that politicians who become very popular are very hard to dislodge from power, even if most people loathe them. And so if Donald Trump can hang on to his adoring political base, he’s likely to be re-elected in 2020, regardless of how many people detest him.

If people had anti-votes they could use to vote against someone rather than pro-votes they could use to vote for someone, it would likely all be completely different. Trump would never have been elected president because far more people seem to loathe him than love him. Whoever got elected would be the least loathed candidate.

In other news

British police have arrested five* men (*actually the figure has now risen to six) after they were caught on video on social media burning on a bonfire an effigy of Grenfell Tower.

This is a weird story. What crime were they arrested for? What harm did they do to anybody? I can’t see that they did any harm to anyone. It may have been rather tasteless of them, but I can’t see that there was any real harm in what they did.

Or is it now that the law is to be used to simply express disapproval? And indeed, smoking bans are exactly this: they simply express disapproval for a harmless pastime.

It’s the same with “hate crimes.” It seems it’s now a crime to hate something or somebody, and to openly express it. Or rather, it’s a crime to hate the wrong things or people. So it’s OK to hate smoking and carbon dioxide and Donald Trump, but not OK to hate gays and blacks and Muslims. But isn’t hatred simply strong disapproval? If so, making hate into a crime entails expressing strong disapproval for hate, and so hating hate. And isn’t that just another form of hate?

And since us Brits burn an effigy of Guy Fawkes every 5th of November, isn’t that a “hate crime” too?

About Frank Davis

smoker
This entry was posted in Uncategorized and tagged , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

6 Responses to Anti-votes and Hate Crimes

  1. Rose says:

    What crime were they arrested for? What harm did they do to anybody?

    They published the image online for everyone to see and be upset by, rather than keep their nastiness private.
    I think they realised their mistake as they handed themselves into the police almost immediately.

  2. waltc says:

    As of an hour ago, the Ds won 27 not 34 seats. The R’s may still pick up 2 more seats in the senate. Florida is doing a recount on the R senate win and the vote hasn’t yet been finalized in Arizona where the R senator is marginally ahead.

  3. jaxthefirst says:

    Or is it now that the law is to be used to simply express disapproval

    Yup. And to enforce policies. No wonder morale in the police force is so low. The media and “experts” blame it on “the cuts,” but it’s more likely to be that the vast majority of policemen/women who joined the police force to help and protect the community from real, nasty, violent criminals are now totally fed up with being expected to act as paid “enforcers” of nothing more than daft political ideals.

  4. Lepercolonist says:

    “Or rather, it’s a crime to hate the wrong things or people. So it’s OK to hate smoking and carbon dioxide and Donald Trump, but not OK to hate gays and blacks and Muslims.”

    Well stated, Frank. Hate crimes presumes knowing what a person is thinking.

No need to log in

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.