Via Roobeedoo a few days back:
According to a World Health Organization doctor, a global pandemic is imminent, and no one will be prepared for it when it hits. Dr. Tedros Adhanom, director-general for WHO, has said that the next outbreak that will hit us will be a “terrible” one, causing a large death all over the world.
“Humanity is more vulnerable in the face of epidemics because we are much more connected and we travel around much more quickly than before,” said WHO specialist in infectious diseases Dr. Sylvie Brand.
“We know that it is coming, but we have no way of stopping it,” said Brand.
According to Dr. Tedros, the flu is extremely dangerous to everyone living on the planet.This fear was also promoted by experts at the World Economic Forum in Davos, Switzerland last month.
The claims came exactly 100 years after the 1918 Spanish flu that claimed 50 million lives and killed three times as many people as World War I. A mutated strain is the most likely contender to wipe out millions because it can join together with other strains to become deadlier.
“This is not some future nightmare scenario. A devastating epidemic could start in any country at any time and kill millions of people because we are still not prepared.”
“The world remains vulnerable. We do not know where and when the next global pandemic will occur, but we know it will take a terrible toll both on human life and on the economy,” said Dr. Tedros.
I think he’s quite right. It’s one reason why I pay attention to epidemics like Ebola and Zika. They can travel all over the world very quickly. And there’s not much to stop them.
However, not everyone is so sure of Tedros’ terrible warnings…
“Hidden underneath this fear-mongering message of a global pandemic is a far more sinister W.H.O. agenda,” warns Mike Adams, the Health Ranger, publisher of Medicine.news.
“The real agenda is a global push for blind, fear-based acceptance of unsafe, unproven vaccines that will be rolled out alongside the next global pandemic,” Adams warns.
“Fear circumvents rational thinking, which is why the vaccine-pharma cartels routinely turn to irrational fear propaganda to demand absolute and unquestioning acceptance of risky medical interventions that should always be scrutinized for safety and efficacy.” –Natural News
And I think Adams is quite right too. Fortunately, nobody seems yet to have produced a vaccine against tobacco (or maybe they have?) But if they did, Tobacco Control would be pushing for a mass vaccination programme. And once you’d been vaccinated, you would never be able to enjoy a smoke again. And once you’d got the alcohol vaccination too, you’d never be able to enjoy a beer or a whisky or a glass of wine again. And so on, with more or less everything else. After all, that’s what they want: an end to pleasure.
And the way they work is always to push for blind, lie-driven, fear-based acceptance of their nostrums. That’s the modus operandi every single time.
And it’s also why the status of the medical profession, and of the WHO, is heading towards free fall. Fewer and fewer people trust them. And so when a real pandemic, rather than a non-pandemic like the “tobacco epidemic”, eventually hits, a lot of people simply won’t believe them. They’ve been crying wolf too long.
Would I believe the WHO if they declared one day that there was a disease – Disease X – against which everybody should be vaccinated, with a newly prepared vaccine produced by Pfizer?
Experts on the WHO panel say Disease X could emerge from a variety of sources and strike at any time.
“History tells us that it is likely the next big outbreak will be something we have not seen before”, said John-Arne Rottingen, chief executive of the Research Council of Norway and a scientific adviser to the WHO committee.
“It may seem strange to be adding an ‘X’ but the point is to Fmake sure we prepare and plan flexibly in terms of vaccines and diagnostic tests. We want to see ‘plug and play’ platforms developed which will work for any, or a wide number of diseases; systems that will allow us to create countermeasures at speed.”
Advances in gene editing technology, which make the manipulation or creation of entirely new viruses possible, mean that Disease X could emerge through an accident or act of terror.
No. I wouldn’t.