Tobacco Control Must Be Destroyed

I came across this passage yesterday in a ZeroHedge article about fake news, mass hysteria, and induced insanity:

Mass hysteria eventually wears off, as it overloads the emotional circuitry of the target audience; humans soon become desensitized to the triggers used to generate mass hysteria, and it takes heavier and heavier doses of propaganda to maintain the feverishly herd-inducing hysteria.

Eventually, the populace habituates to the stimulus and becomes exhausted by the hysteria.

“Very true,” I thought. Or maybe, “I hope so.” Eventually people will become exhausted by the propaganda-induced tobacco hysteria. They’ll stop being frightened. They’ll cease to care. I never cared anyway. I was never infected by the hysteria in the first place.

But further reading, from before the passage I’ve just quoted, revealed that I had completely missed the point:

“Fake news” is of course the staple of marketing products that end up killing the unwary consumers who buy the hype. The classic example is the cigarette/ tobacco industry, which ran adverts for decades proclaiming absurdities such as the health benefits of smoking (other than dying a horrible, needless death), the “fact” that doctors preferred one brand of cigarette over the other brands, and so on.

The industry famously went to truly monumental lengths to hide the facts about the destructive consequences of smoking from the public, and aggressively attacked any evidence that smoking was remarkably unhealthy as “unscientific,” i.e. beating back the truth with The Big Lie.

That a form of consumption that killed the consumers was unquestionably accepted not just as “normal” but as cool/hip for decades illustrates the staying power of induced insanity. Mass hysteria eventually wears off….

So what was actually being said was that the tobacco industry had induced insanity about smoking in the general public by proclaiming absurdities about the health benefits of smoking.

But what I had been thinking was that the Tobacco Control industry had induced insanity about smoking in the general public by proclaiming absurdities about the health risks of smoking.

But did tobacco industry advertising ever really manage to induce insanity in the public? I know that there was a US ad campaign back in the 50s or 60s in which doctors said they smoked some particular brand of cigarettes (I forget which). But it was just one campaign among many. In my recollection, most cigarette ads usually just showed cigarette packets, or hunky Dave Goerlitz types seated astride horses. Although there were the clever Silk Cut ads that were mentioned in the comments yesterday – but even those ads made no health claims about smoking.

The only ad campaign that I can remember which made an explicit health claim wasn’t for a tobacco product, but rather an alcoholic beverage: Guinness Is Good For You.

In fact, never mind tobacco, can advertising anything ever induce insanity? Does simply the sight of, say, an elegant bottle of Cinzano on a billboard literally drive people mad, and get them to buy gallons of the stuff, and drink themselves to death? And if all advertising of everything was banned, would people stop buying anything at all?

The Tobacco Control industry certainly seems to believe in the power of advertising, because what it now engages in is a truly monumental antismoking anti-advertising campaign, in which its antismoking anti-ads are plastered all over the cigarette packets themselves. The idea is that if cigarette advertising is what induced countless millions of smokers to start smoking, then a really powerful anti-smoking anti-advertising campaign will induce them to stop smoking. Or, to put it another way, if one form of insanity can be induced by cigarette ads, an equal and opposite form of insanity can be induced by anti-smoking anti-ads.

And yet, after 25 years or more since tobacco advertising was banned in the UK, and replaced with an ever-mounting antismoking anti-advertising campaign, there are still a great many smokers in the UK, and we learned only a few days ago that 92% of confirmed smokers continue to enjoy smoking, and have no intention of stopping smoking (I’m one of them). Doesn’t that mean that the anti-smoking anti-advertising campaign simply isn’t working? And doesn’t that suggest that the cigarette ads of yesteryear didn’t really work either? And that there are other reasons aside from advertising that get people to start smoking?

I don’t think the tobacco industry ever managed to induce insanity in the public. But I think that the antismoking Tobacco Control industry has indeed induced insanity in the public. Its antismoking campaign was directed at smokers, but only succeeded in driving non-smokers insane, creating millions of people who are terrified of somebody smoking even in an adjacent dwelling. And Tobacco Control is quite deliberately trying to drive people insane. It’s trying to whip up a global antismoking hysteria. And it does so using innumerable lies (like the Black Lung Lie).

Tobacco Control is itself a menace to civilisation. It’s a menace to truth and honesty and civility. It’s time to recognise that Tobacco Control must be destroyed. It must be expunged from the face of the earth just like Nazism (from which it grew) or any other poisonous ideology.

We live in hysterical times. Global warming alarmism is another form of hysteria. And so is the latest hysteria over supposedly “fake news” planted by the Soviet Union Russia in order to secure the election of their Manchurian candidate Donald Trump in place of the rightful winner, Hillary Clinton. It seems it’s impossible for some people to believe that she lost because she was actually a lousy candidate, devoid of charisma, and with no discernible message apart from More Of The Same. No, it has to be the Russians – whose role is to be perpetual bad guys – just like the tobacco industry with its fiendishly clever advertising.

About Frank Davis

This entry was posted in Uncategorized and tagged . Bookmark the permalink.

32 Responses to Tobacco Control Must Be Destroyed

  1. Timothy Goodacre says:

    Obviously the ZeroHedge guy is a complete idiot and has totally missed the point. We all enjoy smoking and why would you stop what you enjoy. I object to these twats covering my cigarette packets with their propaganda. Good job i never meet any and don’ t carry a gun.

    • Manfred says:

      The propaganda issue came up in conversation with the Chair of a national ethics committee, charged with providing ethical approval to permit the images on cigarette packets to be made yet larger and more lurid. A brief discussion ensued in which I asked when the committee would be approving lurid images of the mangled bloody bodies and limbs of car crash injuries to be plastered over vehicles and their advertising literature, or similar to alcoholic beverages. He quite stopped literally dead in tracks as he had never considered this or the simple point I was raising.

  2. Vlad says:

    More doctors smoke Camels than any other cigarette! :)

    If we use the antismokers’ logic that advertising (which in today’s hysteria this also means seeing the packs in the shelf) leads to smoking, then in 1990 in Soviet Union and the countries from the eastern block there were no smokers!! Ups.

  3. Dinarzad says:

    Grateful for your messages, Frank. In this good year of 2017, fraternal hugs to all smokers and anti-smokers.

  4. cherie79 says:

    The only pro smoking ad I remember was a poster saying Craven A was good for your throat. I enjoy smoking and have no intention of stopping. I will never understand how smoking, considered fairly normal only a few short years ago, became demonised. Also how private businesses were ordered to act as enforcers and why, given an aging population, and smoking is supposed to kill us off early sure it should be encouraged? Though in my family the smokers lived longest and none of them got dementia either. Plus the loss of tax revenue as more people give up or buy abroad and the increasing legalisation of cannibis, don’t know the difference between smoking one plant or another! Happy New Year to you and yours.

    • natepickering says:

      I too am amazed at the cognitive dissonance of those (and there are a frightfully large number of them) who view tobacco smoke as a health hazard akin to mustard gas, but argue just as forcefully that cannabis smoke is 100% benign.

      • Joe L. says:

        This continues to boggle my mind as well.

        • narbanor says:

          All the more so considering that ‘joints’, ‘reefers’, or whatever they’re called these days usually also contain (or used to, until fairly recently?) tobacco, at least in equal proportion most of the times, and burn in exactly the same way. Are we, in addition to the rest of the TC paranoid baloney, expected to gobble up that ‘evil’ tobacco and ‘divine’ pot balance each other out in these types of mixtures?

      • beobrigitte says:

        Houston,we’ve gorra problem. Cannabis is happily smoked with TOBACCO. Best method. Definitely does the job.

    • Timothy Goodacre says:

      Happy New Year Cherie XXx

  5. Harleyrider1978 says:

    Smoking gives people a reason to live!

    • beobrigitte says:

      This is exactly what I encounter these days. Illegal cigarettes in old folks’ homes brings back innovation to otherwise written off people. Where I can I make that bit 007 style and the response is an innovation you wouldn’t see. (*Debbie sucking another crate of lemons now*)

  6. Rose says:

    Its all happened before – in America.

    The Hundred-Year War Against the Cigarette

  7. natepickering says:

    “Its antismoking campaign was directed at smokers, but only succeeded in driving non-smokers insane”

    This is a strong candidate for Most Insightful Comment of the Year.

  8. Steven says:

    I would to wish you frank and all the other contributors to this message board a very happy and health new year.dont give up the battle.We will succeed.

  9. Roobeedoo2 says:

    Happy New Year to Frank et al…

    Following Frank’s post yesterday, I’ve decided to name each rollie I make after a prominent Anti Smoker… Debs is burning up nicely from between my lips right now. All resulting ash will be filed away in the bin…

      • Joe L. says:

        Unfortunately this YouTube video wrongly attributes this cover to Kurt Cobain; it’s actually another band performing it. I would have loved to hear more Kurt Cobain Beatles covers.

    • beobrigitte says:

      Following Frank’s post yesterday, I’ve decided to name each rollie I make after a prominent Anti Smoker…
      Like fuck I will!!! My ciggies are named after each punch I pack. Training is going good. Upper body easy. And the minute I get the opportunity to pack that punch into the face of the coward who beats up the women he thinks he can use and throw out as he likes it’ll be my royal tobacco mix.
      THEN comes the rest of the scum.

  10. Inspector Alleyne says:

    I wish you a very happy and successful New Year Frank. You are truly a force to be reckoned with!

  11. Smoking Lamp says:

    I fully agree with you Frank. The tobacco control cult is the source of mass hysteria about smoking. After all the current antismoker sentiment is a direct result of their campaign of lies and exaggeration designed to denormalize smokers. And yes, Tobacco control must be destroyed!

  12. Lepercolonist says:

    Most cigarette advertising is for brand recognition. No different than deodorants, cars or mobile phone services. Induced insanity, ridiculous.

  13. Harleyrider1978 says:

    Not put up yet but man the nazis are using these kids are being used better than butler did with his own butler youth program

No need to log in

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.