I was watching some US TV channel today that was discussing Email2, and there was a Democrat operative trying desperately (and unsuccessfully) to draw attention away from this latest bunch of 650,000 emails and put the focus back on Trump, and in particular Trump’s “documented” ties to Russia.
As far as I can see, the idea is that the Russians hacked Hillary Clinton’s server (Email1) and passed them to Wikileaks, and so the whole attack on Hillary’s campaign is really Russian subversion of US democracy, and amounts almost to an act of war.
My guess is that if it ever looks like Donald Trump might win the election, Obama will start a war with Russia, declare a state of emergency, and rally Americans behind the only person who can stand up to Putin, now that it’s been proved conclusively that Donald Trump is a
Soviet Russian sleeper agent: Hillary Clinton.
The Russians seem to be taking it seriously.
PUTIN’S WAR CRY: Russian leader says ‘we will fight UNTIL THE END’ as WW3 fears escalate
VLADIMIR Putin has urged Russians to “fight until the end” as tensions continue to mount between the West and the Kremlin.
A week or so back a Russian fleet sailed through the English Channel en route for the Mediterranean. Yesterday a Russian sub followed them. Three days ago there was an “air miss” between US and Russian warplanes over Syria. And British troops have been deployed on the Russian border.
With Hillary Clinton’s campaign seemingly tanking under the Email2 furore, it may be necessary for Obama to invoke the armageddon option later this week. What happens if last week’s “air miss” is followed by this week’s downing of a US or Russian jet over Syria? The US mainstream media will drop the election, and focus on the “outbreak of war”, with Donald Trump – proven Russian sleeper agent – now cast in the role of American traitor.
What can Putin do to prevent this happening? An interesting report caught my eye yesterday:
Russian President Vladimir Putin has officially rejected a request from his nation’s Defense Ministry to endorse a resumption of Russian airstrikes against the Syrian city of Aleppo, after 10 straight days of no Russian airstrikes being conducted.
Russia launched a brief ceasefire in Aleppo last week, and extended it for four days. Even after it officially expired, they have not resumed strikes against the city, with officials saying they want to convince Western nations to separate the moderate rebel factions within East Aleppo from the al-Qaeda-linked Nusra Front.
“10 straight days of no Russian airstrikes” is interesting. Also interesting that Putin has rejected a request to resume them. And one obvious reason (to me at least) is that Putin doesn’t want to give Obama any excuse to start a war.
There really ought to be 10 more days of no Russian airstrikes. In fact, Putin might even withdraw all Russian air power from Syria for the next 10 days. No possibility whatsoever of any more “air misses” that way.
The period of maximum danger is this week. Putin has to do everything possible to prevent a war starting this week. Next week it won’t matter.
It’s not that I think WW3 is imminent. It’s just that I think that a Democratic US president who’s desperate to get a Democrat into the White House next week will be quite prepared to start a war with Russia to do so. The “war” will only have to last a few days until Hillary Clinton is swept into office by a stampeded US electorate. After she’s been elected, the “war” will come to a speedy end, having served its purpose.
I’m not the only person thinking along these lines. Last week talk radio host Michael Savage was saying he expected US jets to be taking on Russian jets over Syria this (past) weekend. It didn’t happen, but it still might.
He also said he expected that US jets would prevail because “we’ve got better planes and better pilots.” I’m not so sure about that. The problem with US defence procurement seems to be that it comes in late, way over budget, and often doesn’t work very well. The Russians seem to do it all much more quickly, cheaply, and effectively. It’s for this reason that Paul Craig Roberts has been saying for years that if Russia ever goes to war with NATO, it will defeat it in days.
Rush Limbaugh was even toying with the thought today:
RUSH: Right. So your point is that we are in a position or situation here that is fraught with danger with the Russians, because they’re ready. They are loaded and ready, and they’re taunting us, and we’ve got people toying around with things in the geopolitical sense. For example: Blaming the Russians for the WikiLeaks stuff.
I should add that I don’t see Russia as any real threat. It’s not the Soviet Union any more. It’s not trying to export Communism any more. They’ve been trying since about 1990 to reach an accommodation with the West (which they’ll get if Trump is elected), but they’ve been too useful as an old Cold War enemy to let that happen.