Smoking is Good For You – part 3

Smoking and drinking and eating are pleasant pastimes. It is perhaps not possible to explain exactly why this is so, but it nevertheless is so. It is somehow or other a great pleasure to sit at a table, and drink a beer, and smoke a cigarette, and munch peanuts or crisps. It’s also a pleasure to kick around balls, or bat them to and fro, or paddle or swim in water, or fly kites, or gaze at passing clouds. It’s also a pleasure to see a beautiful woman (like the one that’s currently in the right hand margin of this page). It’s not possible to say exactly why she is beautiful. She just is. And it gladdens the heart to see her.

It doesn’t need any advertising campaign to get people to enjoy smoking and drinking. They’ll find out anyway. If advertising is of any value, it is to get customers to buy one brand of cigarettes in preference to another, or one make of beer rather than another, the differences between them being so marginal as to be almost enitely unnoticeable.

On the other hand, it requires a continuous and unrelenting campaign to get people to stop enjoying any of these things. It is possible to make people abhor smoking or drinking or sex by repeatedly associating them with death and disease. It is possible to get men to hate the sight of women, and make them cover their faces and their bodies. It is possible to get people to hate the sight of cigarettes, or glasses of beer, or plates of food, or even passing clouds.

But the key thing is that it requires a continuous campaign to make people stop enjoying doing things which they ordinarily enjoy doing. It requires a continuous exertion of effort to do this in exactly the same way that it requires a continuous expenditure of energy to keep a car moving along a road, or an aircraft flying. Left to themselves, they would come to a halt, or fall to earth. Left to themselves, people will smoke and drink and gaze at clouds. Because that is their nature. That is how they are.

And this is why, in the end, all anti-smoking campaigns and all anti-drinking campaigns and all anti-sex campaigns are doomed to fail. Because in the end it becomes impossible to sustain the continuous effort needed to make people dislike what they actually like. As soon as the campaign runs out of money or enthusiasm, people immediately begin to revert to doing what they naturally like doing. And sooner or later these campaigns always do run out of money and enthusiasm, just like cars and airplanes run out of fuel, or forest fires burn themselves out, or storms subside. Anti-smoking campaigns are sandcastles. They superficially appear strong, but they start falling down as soon as they stop being built.

And so, for an anti-smoking campaign to succeed, it has to be continued indefinitely. It can’t last just 5 years or 10 years. It has to go on for 100 years or 1000 years. And even then, the moment it ends, people will start smoking again. Because it’s something they enjoy doing. Like they enjoy kicking balls around. Or lying in the sun. Or eating chocolate chip cookies.

If anything is perverse, it is is not smoking or drinking, but instead the attempt to make people stop smoking or drinking or kicking around footballs. It is perverse to set out to make what is pleasant seem unpleasant. It is as perverse a thing to try to ‘denormalise’ smoking  as it is to try to denormalise football and flirting and daydreaming.

In the end, people will anyway rediscover the simple truth that smoking is good for you, just like sunbathing and kite-flying and playing chess and reading books is good for you. They are good because they are pleasurable and enjoyable.

It is the delusion of antismokers to suppose that smoking is an addiction, or that the addictive substance is nicotine, or that smokers only smoke because tobacco is advertised for sale, or because they see people smoking in movies. It is a delusion to suppose that if people can be once induced to give up smoking they will never take it up again. For if that is true of smoking, then the same must be true of every other pleasure in life. And it is not true. And it never will be true.

About Frank Davis

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

2 Responses to Smoking is Good For You – part 3

  1. Anonymous says:

    Hello Mr Davis,
    What I am about to write has nothing very much to do with your most recent remarks. I hope you will forgive that small liberty. I have only recently become a reader of your musings and observations. I have not disagreed with one word. I too drifted inexorably from being tolerant of other people’s little foibles to being pretty bloody intolerant of the fact that they would not simply allow me mine. I too find the garbage punted out about smoking, second and third hand smoke increasingly difficult, if not impossible, to swallow. I too believe that smoking, a quiet (childfree) glass of beer or wine and a brief period of introspection (finding pictures in the clouds) are among nature’s basic joys. It has been a pleasure to find you on the web. It has been interesting and entertaining to read your views. Please keep on writing. There is a need, has always been a need, for those prepared to speak their minds. Bravo

  2. Frank Davis says:

    I will try to keep on writing. But I am a little torn over it. I began this blog by accident, and I wonder how long I can continue it.
    Sometimes I think that the smoking ban, as a subject about which to write, is simply far too restrictive to support a blog, and that I’m bound to dry up sooner or later. And most likely sooner.
    On the other hand, the smoking ban, despite its apparent insignificance, is something that has larger effects upon my life than any other piece of legislation in all my sixty years. It has been profoundly shocking. As well as enraging. And I think this needs exploring and articulating. And the kinds of issues that are wrapped up in it – political, moral, social, medical, scientific – provide paths from the smoking ban into far wider fields. Indeed, it sometimes seems, into absolutely everything else. And, seen that way, the smoking ban is a wonderfully fertile and expansive subject, and not in the least bit restrictive.
    Some days I have nothing to say about it. And some days I have too much to say.

No need to log in

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.